Whoever said that IPL T20 was
cricket was deluding himself. It is a private club run by quasi-businessmen, part-criminal
bunch of cronies who call themselves the Board of Control for Cricket in India.
After all didn’t the BCCI say in the Supreme Court on September 29, 2004, "If India plays England, it is a
match played by the official team of BCCI and not the official team of
India." It even said that players like Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly
and Rahul Dravid played for the official team of the Board and were not the
official team of India and that "We do not even fly the national flag nor
do we use any national emblem in the activities of the Board". And like
fools drunk on patriotism and national spirit, we had been hailing these
players and indeed the entire Indian team as national heroes and role models
for our children. We must thank the BCCI for this deposition in the Supreme
Court, since we can now rest easy and say that what has been shamed is not the
nation but the BCCI. Thank you BCCI, I am greatly relieved. You and you alone
are answerable for the ignominy that you have brought to Indians. The rest of
the world, however, still thinks that you administer the Indian Cricket and not
merely a private club.
IPL T20 was never about cricket. It was a grand business plan
for the rich middle-aged businessmen and sidelined corporate houses, who having
got bored with fake board room deliberations that stamped family decisions as
corporate ones, shareholder-funded family holidays in the Alps, motion sickness
in private yacht cruises, extended tours of the beaches and jungles in company
of young beauties in the name of printing calendars were looking for something
new and stimulating. Here comes the IPL T20, which with its artificially
created yet superficial city loyalities to teams filled with foreign players, attempted
to stir up new emotions that was not commercial, not sexual, not show-biz and
not routine business rivalry. Yet it was all of these.
What goes up must come down. And, what goes up fast falls
like a meteorite, all burnt up, causing destruction all round. In just six to
seven years, the IPL, in spite of having earned previously unheard of sums for
the players, team owners and organisers has shown the murkiest faces of all
these and has disappointed the innocent fans no end. All those breath-taking
finishes, twenty five runs an over, three wickets in five minutes, unbelievable
athletic dive yet missing that catch – were they all fake and fixed?
The BCCI claims it is a sports body, yet it refuses to
subject its players to WADA regulations and tests. After all when the players
have all night parties after matches, dancing with starlets and models, hobnobbing
with match-fixers and shady middlemen, a little bit of drug-sniffing and
ingestion of performance boosters may even be essential ingredients to make the
amusement complete. The players even have private fashion shows, where a little
bit of frolic in the aisles provides some colour to page 3 and make for
interested viewership the next day. Why spoil the fun with silly rules like the
“whereabout clause”.
BCCI seeks all favours from the government – elaborate police
bandobast, special public bus services to ferry ticket-buyers to the arena,
uninterrupted electricity supply to the game venues even as the rest of the
city swelters in unbearable heat and cheap land for its private stadia. It
makes a thousand crores a year, rakes in the moolah from non-transparent awards
of TV rights (remember Nimbus?), sponsorships of venues and travel and hotels.
Yet, it refuses to pay income tax and claims it is a charitable organisation!
Charity begins at home. And, a happy son in law makes a happy
home. The double standards of this public body called the BCCI can’t be more
stark in the refusal of its President, Srinivasan to step down. Whereas, for a
weaker linkage to a scandal through a nephew, Pawan Bansal had to give up his
Cabinet job due to intense media pressure and a CBI onslaught on a government
functionary, Mr Srinivasan obviously thinks that the post of President of the
BCCI is his birthright. A Secretary level officer of the Railways was arrested
and suspended on accusations of bribery (giving, not taking) just on the basis
of taped phone conversations. But Mr N Srinivasan refuses to resign and the
media is only fashionably irritated with him. After all, they are in the same business together –
money through entertainment, sponsorship and advertisements and of course they
populate same social circuits. An Ashwani Kumar had to quit his Cabinet post
for a non-criminal indiscretion in spite of solid support from the Prime
Minister. Such is the incessant media din that even governments yield to their
rumpus. But, not Mr N. Srinivasan. Even though a close relative, his own son in
law, has been arrested on charges of match fixing, the BCCI President refuses
to budge and claims support of his colleagues. After all, since the Board of
Control for Cricket in India a charitable organisation, minor indiscretions
like match fixing must be condoned. Indeed, he must be congratulated for having
constituted a committee to enquire into the matter. So what, if a country of
over a billion has been cheated of their money and fun of fair game
entertainment.
BCCI’s Code of Conduct and anti-corruption rules (which
specifically include betting and influencing a match) applies to all players
and player support personnel and provides that they would be personally liable
if any acts of omissions are committed even by their coach, trainer, manager,
agent, family member or guest. The Code is indeed an impressive document and
compares well with the Conduct Rules applicable to government officials. But,
whereas government rules apply uniformly to all levels of officials ranging
from a lower division clerk to a Secretary to the government, quite obviously
the BCCI mandarins think they are above the rules they themselves make. So, Mr
Srinivasan has proclaimed that none in the BCCI wants him to quit. Next, we
will hear from Dawood Ibrahim that he can’t quit from his perch since none in
his gang wants him to go!
Sorry, Mr Srinivasan! You are neither running a private club
nor a charitable organisation. You deal with public money, collected at the ticket
counters, paid for by consumers every time they buy a consumer product
sponsored by your organisation and your puppet players, paid through cable TV
subscriptions and DTH fees and through taxes paid to the government used in
facilitating the massive jamborees of cricket India. You are running an outfit
that is as unabashedly commercial as any other and must play by the same rules.
Please follow your own rules that lay down that indiscretions by family members
will deem to have been done by an official. A government officer is suspended
and a minister loses his portfolio so that impartial enquiry is carried out.
You must follow the same path. Quit, so that your lackeys that pass for
independent members of the BCCI, can take a view not influenced by your benign
presence as the President. Yes, we assure you that once you come out squeaky
clean from the enquiry, we will restore to you the position that you think God
himself has bestowed upon you.
Dear Shubhranshu,
ReplyDeleteI have been a keen follower of cricket, be it Team India or Team BCCI. You would know that Team England was once Team MCC. And so on...
While most of my friends have already assumed a high moral ground on this ghastly affair, I propose to march in the opposite direction. I don't mind saluting their good intentions as I pass, a friendly nod or two never did any harm.
Now we come to the so called "wrong-doings" that have made headlines recently. I admit that the sentiments of cricket lovers would surely be offended by the "fixing". But then, aren't we as people are offended by many more actions (apart from cricket), time and again, in different context of our lives. Should such offenders be forced to lay down their office or sent to jail? Surely not if there are no laws of the land that have been violated. The action of "bringing the game of cricket to disrepute" is in violation of a BCCI rule / code and by your own admission based on the BCCI's out-pourings in the Supreme Court, the BCCI is NOT a legal representative of motherland India.
Railwaymen would not care to understand such dichotomy, having been brought up on a diet of "responsibility fixing" for every sundry event that offends the sensibilities of the PTBs (Powers-That-Be). The charges levelled against such charged officials are often no more that an act committed by them "unbecoming of a railway servant". Only in the rarest of rare cases, violation of a particular rule could be cited, even in accident or vigilance cases. Legally such charges are not at all sustainable as the blame game is only a temporary protection device for safeguarding the higher management levels by ignoring system failures brought about by incompetent PTBs. But have we been able to shun the gifts (illogical ways to punish the lowly natives/ workers) of our British rulers in all these years of independence?
Unfortunately, we may not be able to use "unbecoming of a BCCI servant" while trying to "fix" Mr. Srinivasan & Co., for they have done only a little wrong. Interestingly, after the "three rotten eggs" were arrested, a question arose "how to book them u/s 420 of IPCC" in absence of a complaint? The Team owners of Rajasthan Royals had to be cajoled to file a FIR against the trio before they could be taken into custody! Even today, it is only the money trail of "fixing" that is of legal consequence. If a match is fixed due to a friendly bet (without involvement of money) and the game of cricket got into disrepute, I don't think there would be any broken laws of the land. Such fixing had always been there (as an example: Take the last league match between KKR and SRH, where a win for KKR would not affect KKR but take RCB to the play-offs. I am sure, the grudge between the captains of KKR and RCB may have had KKR to lose the match happily and send SRH to the play-offs. It would also make the Team India selector happy too, since he is a mentor for the SRH. Now since no money is involved and the match "thrown" on goodwill basis, it would not qualify for investigations.).
There is a difference between "amoral" and "immoral". Between the "venial" and "venal". Between a "immoral" wrong-doing and an "illegal" wrong-doing. We must be able distinguish between them without being made judgmental by our prejudices. I rest my case.
Regards,
Saibal Bose
Thanks, Saibal! For the detailed comment. while I agree that the BCCI may eventually be absolved of all guilt as they have probably not violated any law of the land, the fact remains that they do deal with public money and must be held accountable. It was gratifying to see the TV debate, later in the evening, raising the points that I had raised in my blog.
ReplyDeleteI am certain that Srinivasan will have to go.
Shubhranshu